Well, I have to say the scenes in Westminster, the scenes in Parliament Square Wednesday night, were nothing short of a total disaster.
And there it was, from the river to the sea projected onto Big Ben in central London.
Now we know what from the river to the sea means.
It means the abolition of the state of Israel and frankly, the eradication of the Jewish people that live there as well.
Nigel Farage says a dangerous message was projected onto Big Ben
GB NEWS
That is how damaging, dangerous and nasty that message is.
And I wonder, what do the police do about it? Well, they've issued this statement and I can't think of anything, frankly, more weaselly.
They talk about circumstances in which this might be offensive, but they've decided in this particular case there will be no further action.
And that's been the pattern, folks. That has been the pattern ever since the first pro-Palestinian March, which took place in London on the Saturday after the October the 7th attacks in Israel.
Our police are allowing people to go onto the streets to chant hate slogans and they're doing absolutely nothing about it.
And why? Because they're fearful of the result, and actually Westminster, our MPs are now scared for their own safety, scared to speak out.
Pro-Palestine protesters outside Parliament
GB NEWS
And I wonder whether Lindsay Hoyle's decision yesterday to allow the Labour amendment was also based on fear.
But I do think some of the finger of blame must be put on to Sir Keir Starmer.
It's all pretty weaselly stuff, I'm afraid.
Whether it was him, whether it was the Labour chief whip, somebody put pressure on the Speaker.
The Speaker says he was concerned about the safety of MPs.
The fact that a British Speaker of the House of Commons even says that shows you that fear now stalks the corridors of Westminster.
And what Lindsay Hoyle did yesterday, frankly, was to try to appease extremist voices in this country, threatening everything we stand for as a free, open democracy. So my question to you is, should Hoyle go?