Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are “taking advantage” of the Royal Family’s vulnerability with their website revamp, according to a royal commentator.
Kinsey Schofield told GBN America that the couple sensed an opportunity after King Charles announced his cancer diagnosis.
Days later, the couple unveiled a new look website that features their regal titles.
Some have claimed that the late Queen was ardently against them doing so after they opted to sever ties with the royal establishment.
Kinsey Schofield has hit out at Harry and Meghan
GB NEWS / GETTY
“The website is not a great look”, she told Patrick Christys.
“It’s almost like they’ve taken advantage of the fact that the Queen is gone and the King is incapacitated.
LATEST ROYAL NEWS:
“He’s not a working member right now and he’s taking a step back.
“I think it looks a little bit like they’re taking advantage of the situation.”
Their previous site, Archewell - a name inspired by their son Archie - has now been replaced with the Sussex.com domain.
A picture of the couple dominates the main web page, overlaid with the text: “The Office of Prince Harry and Meghan, The Duke & Duchess of Sussex.”
In 2020, Harry relocated to the US with his Californian wife, Meghan MarkleGetty
Kinsey Schofield joined Patrick Christys on GBN America
GB NEWS
The couple issued a furious statement in response to criticism following the rebrand, vowing not to be “broken”.
“They’re still here”, a spokesperson for the pair said.
“They’re still working and pursuing what they believe in, despite constantly being challenged and criticised. This couple will not be broken.”
Schofield told Christys that the motive behind the change could be down to the Archewell brand being “polluted”.
“They’ve really polluted the Archewell brand over the last few years”, she said.
“What does Archewell do? People don’t know their core values as a charity or a foundation.
“What’s the ultimate objective there? Perhaps somebody has instructed them to separate Archewell from their personal lives, the personal chaos.
“It’s negatively affecting this charitable brand that they’re trying to get going and get people to take seriously.”
