If there’s one thing Keir Starmer excels at, it’s destruction. At home, public sentiment and polling reflect it with brutal clarity, cementing the most unpopular administration in modern British history less than 18 months after their landslide victory.
Witnessing the economic calamity, tax hikes, migration and free speech policy failures, cancelled elections, lawfare, policing thought, censorship - the list goes on and on.
It seems Labour is destroying the very fabric of the rock-stable society that we inherited in the USA. Abroad, he’s destroying the special relationship - the time-tested Anglo-American relationship that has provided stability to the world.
The latest abomination, his government's frenzied campaign to ban Elon Musk’s X platform—over a spate of Grok-generated AI deepfakes—exposes a grotesque inversion of priorities: swift, draconian threats against digital images while real, documented child rape gangs, often of foreign origin, have long received institutional hesitation, delay, and partial reckoning.
The facts are damning. Starmer has denounced the AI images as “disgraceful” and “disgusting,” demanded X “get a grip,” and empowered Ofcom to pursue “all options,” including a full block under the Online Safety Act.
Technology Secretary Liz Kendall has vowed rapid enforcement, dismissing Musk’s restriction of Grok’s image-editing to paid subscribers as “insulting” and inadequate. Reform UK brands the threat “appalling”.
US lawmakers, including Representative Anna Paulina Luna, warn of sanctions against Starmer personally and Britain as a whole. Musk calls it an “excuse for censorship”, labelling the approach “fascist” and sharing retaliatory AI-generated images of Starmer in response.
This feverish reaction to synthetic fakes stands in stark, nauseating contrast to Labour’s handling of actual, sustained sexual exploitation. As Director of Public Prosecutions from 2008 to 2013, Starmer oversaw a period when thousands of vulnerable British girls — predominantly white working-class — were systematically groomed, trafficked, and raped in towns like Rotherham, Rochdale, Telford, and Oldham by organised gangs disproportionately of Pakistani heritage. Independent inquiries repeatedly exposed how police and councils ignored victims, often paralysed by fears of racism accusations.
While prosecutions increased during his tenure and he introduced important reforms—including appointing a special prosecutor and revising charging guidance — critics, including Musk, point to persistent systemic lags and a broader institutional reluctance to confront uncomfortable cultural patterns head-on.
Labour's fake outrage at Elon Musk's X masks its ideological cowardice towards the rape gangs - Lee Cohen
|Getty Images
Musk’s high-profile accusations of complicity, amplified relentlessly on X, eventually forced Labour’s hand. After months of resistance — dismissing calls for a national statutory inquiry as pandering to the “far-right” — Starmer commissioned Baroness Louise Casey’s audit, which in June 2025 recommended and led to the announcement of a full independent inquiry.
Yet even this process has been plagued by distrust and delay. In October 2025, four survivors resigned from the consultation panel, accusing the Home Office and Labour of “contempt”, “political interference”, and attempting to dilute the remit to obscure ethnic and religious factors. Potential chairs withdrew amid concerns over “vested interests” and “political opportunism”.
The inquiry, now chaired by former Children’s Commissioner Baroness Anne Longfield (announced in December 2025), remains stalled on final terms of reference, with publication not expected until March 2026 at the earliest.
Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips denies any cover-up, but the survivors’ anger speaks volumes: a pattern of glacial, contested progress on real victims versus lightning zeal against AI fakes on a platform that helped force these scandals into the open when officials and legacy media long preferred silence.
Labour weaponises the slogan of “protecting women and girls” to justify sweeping censorship while evading hard truths about actual abuse. This is ideological cowardice masquerading as managerial virtue.
The establishment fears X precisely because it broadcasts their failures unfiltered: porous borders fueling fiscal strain under Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who threatens yet more tax hikes to offset migration shortfalls; security blind spots where the Muslim Brotherhood remains unbanned despite urgent calls from allies like the UAE (which has restricted student funding over radicalisation fears on UK campuses); and a foreign policy record that, while showing flashes of cooperation — such as UK support for the U.S. seizure of the Russian-flagged shadow fleet tanker Marinera in the North Atlantic on January 7, 2026 — still reflects broader equivocation and retreat amid Labour’s domestic preoccupations.
Geopolitically, Britain courts isolation. The special relationship amplifies strength only through shared resolve: secure borders, energy independence, deterrence against Russia, Iran, and China.
Trump’s administration seeks genuine partners in resisting globalist overreach, not supplicants mired in regulatory dogma. Starmer’s censorship crusade risks direct U.S. reprisals, alienates American innovation, and reinforces the very EU-style submission that Brexit was meant to end. National interest demands unyielding control over migration costs that drain public finances, unshackled energy policies free from net-zero zealotry, and defence commitments that truly deter adversaries. Labour delivers erosion: institutional caution, fiscal shortfalls, vulnerability on every front.
Britain confronts a brutal, unforgiving choice: reclaim sovereignty with unflinching resolve or endure Labour’s managed betrayal. Starmer’s record—frantic assaults on X, sluggish and contested justice for raped children—ensures decline.
Free speech throttled, alliances strained, victims sidelined, the nation weakened. Sovereignty is a hard asset, not negotiable rhetoric. It rewards those who face ugly realities without flinching. Labour has chosen evasion. The price is already being exacted. The alternative to strength is not moderation. It is surrender.