The BBC has turned the insincere apology into an industrial process.
Its latest offering arrived when presenter, Rajini Vaidyanathan, disrespectfully referred several times to Her Royal Highness The Princess of Wales as “Catherine Middleton” — her maiden name — while the written statement demoted her further to “Catherine, Princess of Wales”, a style reserved for divorcees.
After nearly fifteen years of marriage and a public life defined by selfless duty, this was no oversight. It was a calculated slight from a broadcaster that has never bothered to hide its disdain for the monarchy as a traditional pillar of British society.
That petty insult, however, is dwarfed by the far graver assault the BBC unleashed nearly a year earlier against the President of the United States, revealed earlier this month.
In late October 2024, the corporation's flagship investigative series aired a full-length special scrutinising Donald Trump's potential return to the White House.
Central to the programme was a carefully assembled montage of his remarks from the day of the Capitol events in early 2021, where producers fused an opening call for supporters to join a march with a later, unrelated exhortation to battle for electoral integrity.
The result was a seamless but fabricated sequence implying that Trump had directly urged a violent push toward the legislative building, complete with visuals of crowds advancing before his address had even begun.
No on-screen alerts flagged the manipulation, leaving audiences with a starkly altered narrative that echoed unsubstantiated claims of incitement — claims that American courts had already rejected for lack of evidence.
The BBC has just given Donald Trump further fuel. Apologies now roll off the production line - Lee Cohen | Getty Images
Executives brushed off internal alarms as routine creative choices, insisting that condensing lengthy addresses into digestible segments was commonplace practice.
Yet no such defence could mask the premeditation: the distortion was repeated without correction, bolstering a one-sided critique that marshalled a roster of Trump's detractors while offering scant equivalent scrutiny of his opponents.
This was not mere summarisation gone awry. It was a deliberate reconfiguration of history, broadcast to millions, designed to cast the leader of Britain's paramount ally as a demagogue unfit for office.
The stakes could not have been higher. As NATO grapples with renewed Russian incursions along Europe's eastern flank, escalating tensions in the Indo-Pacific, and disruptions to vital trade routes from proxy conflicts, the United States remains the linchpin of Western deterrence.
By peddling a falsified portrayal of its commander-in-chief, the BBC did more than besmirch an individual; it sowed discord in the transatlantic framework that has shielded the United Kingdom from existential threats for decades.
Such interference transcends journalism — it borders on meddling in foreign affairs, with repercussions that could ripple from London boardrooms to global summits.
Yet even after that act of calculated malice abroad, the Corporation pressed on with the same contempt at home. While the Princess of Wales recovers from her chemotherapy, the same broadcaster that preaches “kindness” chose that moment to strip her of the title she had borne with quiet dignity through marriage, motherhood, and mortal illness.
She has placed service to Crown and country above every personal comfort — a concept the progressive clerisy at Broadcasting House evidently finds incomprehensible and therefore worthy of diminishment.
The hypocrisy is staggering. Misgendering a guest or calling a “pregnant person” a woman, and resignations would be demanded before the credits rolled. Yet when the future Queen is involved—or an American president that progressives despise — accuracy is abruptly optional. These are not symmetrical lapses; they are ideological sneers.
The apologies, of course, roll off the production line: for the Trump deception, for Huw Edwards, for Bashir, for partisan Brexit coverage, for inflammatory reporting on immigration, and now for this latest royal insult.
Each follows the identical script — regret without accountability, correction without consequence. So many “mistakes” in one direction cease to be mistakes at all.
What links every scandal is a single thread: institutional loathing for the traditions, alliances, and constitutional settlement that have sustained Britain and its closest ally for generations.
The corporation that doctored a presidential address with international ramifications is the same one that cannot muster the elementary professionalism to address a royal princess correctly. The contempt is constant; only the scale varies.
The British people are not deceived. They see a taxpayer-funded broadcaster that lectures them on respect while showing none to their respected institutions and cherished values, and that falsified an American president’s words to sour the alliance on which their security depends.
The BBC’s contempt for Britain and America is no longer concealed—it is flaunted. A country that still compels its citizens by law to fund this institution has every right to demand its abolition or its complete reformation.
Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter
More From GB News