The US is "deeply concerned" over possible national security threats after Labour approved plans for a Chinese "super embassy" in London, according to a White House official.
The senior official told The Telegraph the US is "deeply concerned about adversaries exploiting the critical infrastructure of our closest allies" after Local Government Secretary Steve Reed gave the plans the green light on Tuesday, despite backlash from MPs.
MI5 director general, Sir Ken McCallum, warned in a joint letter with the intelligence and cyber agency, GCHQ, that national security risks at the site near the Tower of London could not be wholly eliminated.
The letter to the Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary read: "MI5 has over 100 years of experience managing national security risks associated with foreign diplomatic premises in London.
TRENDING
Stories
Videos
Your Say
“For the Royal Mint Court site, as with any foreign embassy on UK soil, it is not realistic to expect to be able wholly to eliminate each and every potential risk. (And even if this were a practicable goal, it would be irrational to drive ‘embassy-generated risk’ down to zero when numerous other threat vectors are so central to the national security risks we face in the present era.)"
MPs and peers had called on ministers to reject the plans, warning the embassy, the biggest in Europe, would “create a hub for expanded intelligence-gathering and intimidation operations”.
Mr Reed insisted the decision was made following “a quasi-judicial process”, adding: “This means they must make decisions fairly, based on evidence and planning rules.”
A written statement from the Communities Secretary also said: “All material considerations were taken into account when making this decision.
Labour approved plans for the building at Royal Mint Court, near the Tower of London
|PA
“The decision is now final unless it is successfully challenged in court."
A Government spokesman meanwhile insisted “countries establishing embassies in other countries’ capitals is a normal part of international relations”.
The spokesman added that there were “clear security advantages” to the Chinese consolidating their seven different embassy sites in London into one large building.
The Government said Mr Reed agreed with the planning inspector “that any ethical or similar objections to the provision of an embassy for a specific country cannot be a material planning consideration”.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Protests have been staged over plans for the 'super embassy'
|PA
Critics of the scheme are already planing to challenge the decision in the courts, with local residents raising money to launch a judicial review against the project.
The Government's approval of the plans could risk provoking Donald Trump, who has also criticised Sir Keir Starmer's Chagos Islands deal, saying "there is no doubt" China sees it as an "act of total weakness".
Labour has agreed to hand over the islands to Mauritius but will pay billions of pounds to lease back the strategically important Diego Garcia base.
Ministers have claimed the deal is necessary because international court rulings in favour of Mauritian claims to sovereignty had threatened the future of the base.
Mr Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform yesterday: “Shockingly, our ‘brilliant’ Nato Ally, the United Kingdom, is currently planning to give away the Island of Diego Garcia, the site of a vital US Military Base, to Mauritius, and to do so FOR NO REASON WHATSOEVER.
“There is no doubt that China and Russia have noticed this act of total weakness.”
More From GB News