'David Lammy must realise that he's a national joke - just look at the company he keeps,' Patrick Christys says

David Lammy said: "I made it clear in Parliament that on a paper based system, there will always be human error, and there had been a human error for all of my lifetime.

"Until we move to a completely digital system, I think it's impossible to rule out error. But there has been a spike. It's on a downward trajectory. There have been 12 since I made that statement."

So that's more than 100 under Labour. These people could be violent sexual offenders. Just just listen to his response to the BBC here.

He was thrown the comment: "12 more accidental releases. That's just in the last month or so. I mean, that will be shocking for people who who would have assumed that since this became such a big public story, it would be less likely to happen. That's taken the total over 100.

Mr Lammy responded: "Well, no, because some of those people have come back into the prison system."

Oh, they've come back. Oh, that's all right, then. I mean, not all of them, though, because when he made a complete plonker of himself in Parliament.

"Of course, we know there have been spikes since 2021 under his watch. When did he come to this House and apologise?

"We've deported more in the last year than they deported in the last five years. In 25 years in this House, I've not wasted a more shameful spectacle, frankly, than what the party opposite left in our justice system."

Yeah. That day it turned out that there were there were, I think, two or three violent criminals at large. Okay, so one was an illegal migrant sex offender who should never have been in Britain. Now he wants you to know that that number has come down.

Sky News asked Mr Lammy: "You're aware of any more violent offenders or sex offenders?

"There have been releases in error since I made that statement. But I'd want to convey that the trend this year is fortunately down," he responded.

Can you see the trend is down? Great. We can all sleep easy. How down is that trend, Mr. Lammy?

Sky asked: "Give me a number on how many?"

"Two," he said.

"We've deported more in the last year than they deported in the last five years. In 25 years in this House, I've not wasted a more shameful spectacle, frankly, than what the party opposite left in our justice system."

Yeah. That day it turned out that there were there were, I think, two or three violent criminals at large. Okay, so one was an illegal migrant sex offender who should never have been in Britain. Now he wants you to know that that number has come down.

Sky News asked Mr Lammy: "You're aware of any more violent offenders or sex offenders?

"There have been releases in error since I made that statement. But I'd want to convey that the trend this year is fortunately down," he responded.

Can you see the trend is down? Great. We can all sleep easy. How down is that trend, Mr. Lammy?

Sky asked: "Give me a number on how many?"

"Two," he said.Two. So, I mean, it's just the same as last time, isn't it?

He's not made any progress then, right? Okay. But I mean, they've obviously been caught, though. I mean, this has got I mean, look, he's got them. We know where they are.

"Are they still at large or have they been apprehended?" he was asked.

"It's important that I release that data in the way that it's always been released. And it's also important that I work with police where someone is at large.

"And sometimes because the police are about to nab somebody, they actually don't want me to discuss it. And it's important that they get.

"Are those two people still at large or not, are they?

There are two people currently at large.

Right. We got there in the end. So you don't know where they are. Shouldn't we know who these people are? Isn't it in the public's interest to have these violent offenders faces plastered all over the news, details of their possible whereabouts?

I mean, don't we have a right to know? These are dangerous people with nothing to lose who are out on the prowl. And we find out about it because David Lammy is forced into it on the morning press round.

And this is the guy who is scrapping jewellery trials. Now the right to a jury trial was enshrined in Magna Carta as Robert Jenrick pointed out earlier today.

In a social media post, he said: "Runnymede, June 15, 1215 King John seals the Magna Carta. In it, no free man will be imprisoned except by the lawful judgment of his peers. December 2 2025 David Lammy tears it up."

For 800 years in Britain we have had jury trials, but now David Lammy wants to do away with, roughly speaking, about 80% of them.

I mean, for all those years since 1215 where we've had jury trials, who could have thought that the bloke of mastermind who thought that Henry VIII succeeded Henry VII to the throne, would be the one to scrap them.

David Lammy thought that people who were hardline Brexiteers were worse than Nazis.

He was asked: "By implication, you're comparing the ERG to the Nazi Party, or at least the South African racists. Now, whatever you think about the ERG, that was an unacceptable comparison, wasn't it?"

"Andrew, I would say that that wasn't strong enough," Mr Lammy responded.

David Lammy likes to say that leaving the ECR is bad because we'd be like Putin's Russia or Belarus. Let's have a look at what other people's scrap jewellery trials when they came to power.

Lenin, Mussolini, Hitler, Franco, Mao, Castro, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi and the Ayatollah of Iran.

Now, hey, I'm not suggesting you share those views, but that's some company you keep, Mr Lammy, isn't it?

David Lammy must realise that he's a national joke.

The only problem is that if any of these violent or sexual offenders harm anyone whilst they're back out on the prowl, nobody will be laughing. In fact, we will all be apoplectic with rage.

Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter