If you can’t define a biological woman, you cannot protect women and girls, says Dan Wootton
Dan Wootton speaks out on Keir Starmer's gender stance
GB News
Slippery Starmer thought he had finally solved the issue of his publicly declared gender extremism
Don't Miss
Most Read
Trending on GB News
Slippery Starmer thought he had finally solved the issue of his publicly declared gender extremism that he has just seen bring down the once untouchable political career of the former Scottish First Minister Scheming Nicola Sturgeon.
You’ll remember, of course, that Starmer and his most senior henchwomen have spent the past year being completely unable to define what a woman is and whether a woman can have a penis…
Knowing that sticking to such a position will result in electoral suicide, Starmer decided on an interview with The Sunday Times to publicly reset.
But when asked on a train journey from Plymouth to London whether a woman can have a penis, he ran directly into a PR catastrophe: He still thinks so.
Starmer answered…
“For 99.9 per cent of women, it is completely biological . . . and of course they haven’t got a penis.”
Now this situation would be farcical if it wasn’t so serious.
If you can’t define a biological woman, you cannot protect women and girls.
You cannot guarantee them single sex spaces for their own protection or the ability to compete in sport versus those who have the same biological characteristics for their own protection.
But this sorry tale is spreading across the world and is a lesson in why woke leaders are currently eating themselves.
As far as I’m concerned, for as long as Slippery Starmer believes a woman can have a penis it is impossible to trust Labour to protect the rights of biological women, which are under attack.
And that means he must never become Prime Minister.
You may like
