It's time to have a serious conversation about tagging migrants if Britain keeps letting them in, says Patrick Christys

So the latest is this - out of around 5,700 people identified for removal to Rwanda, only 2,145 continue to report to the Home Office and can be located for detention.

So what's that then? Around 3,500 have vanished, have they? Yes.

So if we've still got about 100,000 people waiting for their asylum applications to be approved or rejected, then by that logic, do we even know where 60 per cent of them are?

All that left-wing hoo-ha about how the Government has lost a load of asylum seeker children. Look, I don't buy it. Okay?

Yes, some of them will be children. But let's be honest, loads of them will be adults. Now, as reported in January, about 45 per cent of the 8,766 kids checked by border officials since the start of 2020 turned out to be fully grown adults. Some of them were in their 30s.

So this bodes well doesn't it for people living in communities like Faversham in Kent, where I visited, where there is set to be an asylum centre for illegal immigrants aged allegedly 16 to 18, who will just be free to roam around.

We are not keeping track of these people. Normal people have a right to be worried.

But it is any wonder when you've got Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum running the show. I mean, these Chuckle Brothers from the Home Office have been torn to shreds by the Home Affairs Select Committee so many times I'm surprised there is anything left of them.

I mean, for goodness sake, honestly, this lot? Really? Is that the best we've got?

Well, isn't the answer's no, isn't it?

But is it not time to have a serious conversation about tagging asylum seekers if the Government is going to keep letting them in?

They're making them live in our communities and pay for them, the least they can do is be able to tell us where the heck they are. It's a matter of national security.