'Ofcom's ruling is clearly nonsense and is an attempt to silence GB News,' writes Paul Bristow

This is clearly nonsense and appears to be an attempt to silence a news broadcaster that simply gave members of the public a chance to ask the Prime Minister a question.

One of the main pillars of democracy is the ability to hold politicians to account - freedom of speech and freedom of the press come hand in hand with this. I hope Ofcom are not forgetting the latter.

GB News, since its creation, has marketed itself as a counterbalance to what many perceive as a liberal bias in the mainstream media.

Whether you agree with this or not, it is undeniable that the presence of diverse viewpoints in media and news sources improves public discourse and debate.

Ofcom's potential sanctions seem to undermine this diversity and appear to be an escalation in the regulation of free speech.

Regulatory bodies like Ofcom play a crucial role in maintaining standards and protecting the public from harmful content. However, their decision to sanction GB News raises significant concerns about the balance between regulation and censorship.

All this will do is decrease public trust in such regulators and frankly increase support for GB News itself.

In a healthy society, the media should be free to challenge the status quo, question narratives, and present alternative views. If they are responsible, they should be able to do this without the fear of regulatory bodies.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

• Farage hails BBC 'mask slip' - 'Exposed their sheer BIAS - why GB News was established!'
• BBC blasted for 'inflammatory' comment amid Farage row: 'Clearly broke Ofcom rules!'
• The 1% Club viewers 'complain to Ofcom' over 'disrespectful' decision to change contestant's name

If things have changed, then we should look no further than the BBC. This revelation should make them very uneasy. They are repeat offenders of breaking impartiality rules (a certain former English footballer comes to mind).

If regulators like Ofcom take these sorts of steps to intervene when members of the public simply ask questions, surely they must treat other broadcasters with the same level of intolerance?

I do sincerely hope Ofcom comes to their senses. The timing of this decision is interesting in itself. GB News can be very critical of the Government. It has become a favourite broadcaster for many of the population.

They have proved the nay-sayers wrong that predicted it wouldn’t be able to compete with the likes of Sky, ITV, and the BBC. They actually often have better-viewing figures than many of these alternative outlets.

Sanctioning a network that is already seen by many as innovative, positively different, and standing against a perceived media consensus, is not a good look.

This is especially true in an environment where trust in the media and the news is already low among so many members of the public.

This is who Ofcom are there to protect, the public. And the irony of sanctioning a programme that gave those members of the public a chance to have their say speaks for itself.

They must be careful to maintain credibility as an independent, impartial regulator and not one that overly polices public discourse.

The implications for freedom of speech are clear. These are the factors at the very core of a democracy and indeed the free flow of ideas. We should watch Ofcom’s next step very closely.