'Prevents guidelines are ridiculous it is more likely terrorists would come here via dinghy,' says Nana Akua

Many who could expose it were either involved or afraid of being called racist because most perpetrators were of Pakistani heritage. That is a fact. Instead, councillors, police, and those in the know appeared to turn a blind eye or, worse still, blame the girls themselves.

Then, the racist label was passed on to those calling out the illegal migrant crisis for what it is an invasion. Gary Lineker likened the language to that of 1930s Germany, when the Nazis were in power, basically suggesting you are a complete racist bigot if you believe we are being invaded, which we are.

Only the other day, Sir Keir Starmer’s buddy Lord Hermer suggested that wishing to leave the EU was moving us closer to Nazism, thereby demonising anyone who wishes to leave the convention.

But sadly for those throwing out the racist slur, it’s lost its power because when it comes to mass illegal migration, many white, Asian, and Black Britons agree that illegal migration, in particular the boats, is wrong and unfair.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

• 'Britain is in the midst of an unprecedented immigration wave that is transforming the country,' says Nana Akua
• Keir Starmer will claim victory over migration - but it was the Tories who did the work
• Keir Starmer's US trade deal means gambling with the future of British farmers

I cannot speak for others, but it is my view that many people of colour who came here legally are peeved watching people abuse the system.

So it no longer works to call people racist for calling out the issue. It seems we are all racists then. This insult is no longer powerful enough to deter people from speaking up.

To get around this, they now suggest that concern about mass migration is a terrorist ideology, which means if you are concerned, like me, you’re not a racist, actually you’re a terrorist. That makes me one, and you, if you’re concerned. You really couldn’t make this up.

Prevent guidance says that cultural nationalism, encompassing the conviction that Western culture is under threat, could require referral to a radicalisation scheme. Prevent aims to identify people at risk of turning to terrorism.

This is, of course, the Prevent programme, which failed to stop the Southport attacker, who was referred to it on three occasions.

People at risk of being labelled extremists by the scheme include Douglas Murray and our very own Matt Goodwin on GB News.

Really? Even Sir Keir Starmer could be caught up in this after his Island of Strangers speech, which some likened to one by Enoch Powell: “We risk becoming an island of strangers, not a nation that walks forward together.”

So when you have an immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse, that encourages some businesses to bring in lower-paid workers rather than invest in our young people, or is sold by politicians to the British people on an entirely false premise, then you’re not championing growth or justice.

People defend the status quo. Well, it sounds like he’s concerned about mass migration. Is he a terrorist?

Lord Young, general secretary of the Free Speech Union, has written to the Home Secretary asking her to reconsider, warning anyone referred to Prevent could face serious, long-lasting consequences for their education, employment, and public reputation.

I mean, this is ridiculous because the irony is that it’s more likely terrorists would come here via dinghy.