Labour politicians must be delighted that the nation’s eyes are fixed on the implosion of their awful government because it allows them to escape any scrutiny about the record number of migrants claiming Universal Credit and the RECORD number of migrants who have under Starmer’s regime.
Ministers have deemed their personal survival to be much more important than explaining to hard-pressed voters how it is that, despite pledges of a crackdown, the number of migrants and refugees claiming benefits has doubled in the last three years.
While you have to go out to work for your money, there are now 124,833 people with refugee status picking up an average of £12,000-a-year.
That’s on top of the 53,240 people classed as unable to return to their home countries because they say they would face human rights abuses.
Astonishing the number claiming they are Christians and would be in the most enormous trouble back in their Islamic homelands.
Back in 2022, 64,423 refugees were claiming Universal Credit, and 3,221 with humanitarian status were receiving the benefit.
I agree with the Tories that we are seeing a conveyor belt from the asylum system to the benefits system.
The reality is that we cannot afford the cost of welfare for people in our own country without welcoming the whole damned world to join.
Why don’t we say that anybody who comes here illegally will never be entitled to benefits? Simple as that.
The reality is that Starmer doesn’t care how many turn up at Dover. He takes the view that they will all be Labour voters one day.
Take this fact: more migrants have crossed the Channel under Sir Keir Starmer than under any other Prime Minister.
That’s why he wants to hold on to office, to guide more across the water.
Keir Starmer must be pleased you don't know about a record jump in small boats to benefits - Kelvin MacKenzie | Getty Images
He gained office 19 months ago, and 65,922 have reached the UK since then at a rate of 790 a week. Under Boris Johnson, another complete failure when it came to migrants (and much else, by the way), that number was 65,811.
During Johnson's time as PM, migrants were arriving on average at 404 a day, while under Starmer, it has doubled to 790 a week.
Remember ‘’smash the gags’’. Remember ‘’ one in one out. If Starmer wanted a winning catchphrase, he would have done better with ‘’welcome to Rwanda’’. But he knew that Rwanda would work, but since it would damage his CV as a human rights lawyer, he scrapped the idea.
And then sent you the bill in the shape of a massive benefits increase. This is not sustainable. We are no longer a wealthy country – compared to Africa and the Middle East, we are doing well- but
Come the General Election, I will be betting the house on a huge win for some kind of Reform-Tory victory. Both are committed to scrapping the European Court of Human Rights, and that in itself will be enough to push most voters their way.
It doesn’t matter the name of a Labour Prime Minister. All are committed to allowing more and more people from across the world to receive free housing, free health and a dollop of other benefits for which they have never aid and by the look of them never will.
Hopefully, Starmer is thrown out, but who will be thrown in? Will they be inclined to give a special top-up payment because they are in a foreign land which appears to rain all the time?
Let me just point out that minorities may hate Labour just like the rest of us.
In the upcoming Gorton & Denton by-election, my bet is that the Greens will skate home as 30 per cent of the voters are Muslim and they love the pro-Gaza rabble rousing of Polanski. Reform will be second, and Starmer’s mob nowhere.
Welcome to sectarian politics.
I love the fact that Starmer and whoever follows him will finally work out that Islam is not loyal to them, so it’s no use encouraging the boats full of young Muslim men. It will be too late.
His bet didn’t work. Good.
More From GB News