'Jim Ratcliffe had nothing to apologise for - Keir Starmer cares more about tone and language than real problems,' Patrick Christys blasts

Jim Ratcliffe, in my view, anyway, had absolutely nothing to apologise for. So this is the clip that caused all the drama.

Okay. All right. Well, obviously he used the word colonise, which is the point that people are making.

But, this week, an Afghan illegal migrant was found guilty of raping a 12-year-old girl.

And two Tunisian migrants were jailed for trying to kill literally as many people as possible in Manchester.

But okay, it's Jim, is it, who's supposed to apologise? Hmm. Okay.

What is colonisation, though? Because I do wonder if it looks a little bit like this.

I mean, is it the deliberate invasion of Britain?

Keir Starmer put out a social media post about Jim Ratcliffe's comments straight away.

There it is. He says, look, obviously he's got to apologise. He should apologise.

Apparently they know each other quite well.

So then obviously Jim apologised. There it is.

Now I have not heard Sir Keir Starmer say a single word about that 12-year-old girl who was raped by an Afghan illegal migrant.

That is Keir Starmer and the establishment media in a nutshell, isn't it?

They care more about the language or the tone.

I think "you used the word colonised, or it could be inflammatory" than they actually do about the actual problems of mass, uncontrolled immigration.