From across the Atlantic, as someone who deeply admires your country — our mother country — I know scores of Britons join me in thanking President Trump for doing what too many in Westminster have always lacked the courage to do: holding the propaganda-spinning BBC to account.
A day of reckoning is coming for the BBC — and, ironically, it’s being delivered by America’s most pro-British president in recent memory. For every ordinary Briton who has spent years paying up while watching this broadcaster distort reality, this moment must be cathartic.
Florida judge, Roy K. Altman, has delivered a blunt message to Britain's biased national broadcaster: no escape, no delay. On February 11, 2026, Altman rejected the BBC's motion to stay discovery in President Donald Trump's $10billion (£7.5billion) defamation lawsuit, clearing the way for the exchange of internal emails and other documents and setting a provisional two-week jury trial for February 15, 2027, in Miami.
This is no procedural footnote. It is the moment the licence-fee Goliath is compelled to confront the fallout from a pre-election edit that deliberately misrepresented Trump's January 6, 2021, speech to millions of viewers.
The Panorama documentary Trump: A Second Chance? broadcast on October 28, 2024 — just days before the US presidential election, Trump won decisively — spliced together separate portions of the president's address to supporters.
It combined his statement about marching to the Capitol with "and we fight. We fight like hell", while omitting the intervening language in which he urged the crowd to act "peacefully and patriotically".
The result was a seamless sequence that gave the impression Trump had directly encouraged violence ahead of the Capitol riot.
The BBC later admitted this was an "error of judgement" and apologised in November 2025, pulling the programme from further broadcast and acknowledging that the edit created a "mistaken impression" of a call for violent action. Yet it refused compensation or a fuller retraction, rejecting the basis for any legal claim.
The internal consequences were swift and telling. The scandal led to the resignations of Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News CEO Deborah Turness in November 2025, following the release of leaked memos and widespread criticism of editorial standards. These departures were not mere coincidences; they reflected the depth of the institutional embarrassment.
Donald Trump’s £10billion hammer is about to collapse the BBC's house of cards in real time - Lee Cohen | Getty Images
Trump's legal team alleges the edit was intentional, malicious, and part of a broader effort to interfere in the 2024 election outcome.
The suit claims defamation and violation of Florida's deceptive and unfair trade practices law, seeking $5 billion per count. This fits a proven pattern: Trump has secured substantial settlements from US networks when facts support his complaints.
ABC paid $15million in December 2024 to resolve a defamation claim over anchor George Stephanopoulos's inaccurate statement that Trump had been found "liable for rape" in a civil case.
Paramount (CBS's parent) paid $16million in July 2025 over edited footage in a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. In both instances, the networks chose settlement over prolonged exposure.
Here, the discovery process promises to be particularly damaging. The BBC will soon have to produce emails, editing notes, internal discussions, and decision-making records surrounding the splice, its timing, and approvals.
These materials are highly likely to reveal the extent of institutional bias — call it Trump Derangement Syndrome — that permeated the process.
Settlement becomes not merely probable but almost inevitable: no rational broadcaster would risk the public airing of such evidence in open court, where it could amplify reputational harm far beyond any jury award.
But even if they drag it to trial and somehow win, Trump has already won the war that matters.
The myth of BBC impartiality is dead. Shattered. The licence-fee colossus that has spent decades lecturing Britain on truth and balance stands revealed as the propaganda arm of the metropolitan progressive elite — hostile to Trump, hostile to the interests of ordinary Britons, and hostile to any real assertion of national sovereignty that threatens their worldview.
This is the same mindset that thrives under Keir Starmer's Labour government: unaccountable, self-possessed, convinced that its beliefs are the only legitimate ones.
And ordinary Britons — hard-working people who already resent being forced to subsidise it — are now staring at the very real prospect of bailing out the consequences of deliberate malpractice. That is intolerable.
If this ends in a monster payout — as long as the British taxpayer doesn't have to shoulder the burden — that is not a tragedy. That is justice long delayed.
Britain has no moral duty to keep funding an institution that poisons the minds of audiences on so many levels and smeared America's democratically elected leader on the eve of his triumph.
The BBC's house of cards is collapsing in real time.
More From GB News