Lord Ken Clarke has said that Britain is "moving towards an elected dictatorship" as he launched a scathing attack on Rishi Sunak’s Rwanda Bill.
Lord Clarke was speaking during a debate on the controversial legislation, which would involve flying failed asylum seekers to the East African country.
The former minister who served in the cabinet of Sir John Major is now a crossbench peer and has been an outspoken critic of Brexit.
Lord Clarke, 83, was speaking about the sovereignty of Parliament as the Rwanda Bill makes its way through the House of Lords.
Lord Ken Clarke has been critical of Rishi Sunak's flagship Rwanda scheme
PA/Getty
He said: "As time goes by in my career, I always fear echoes of the warnings that Quintin Hailsham used to give us all about the risks of moving towards an elected dictatorship in this country.
"The sovereignty of Parliament has its limits, which are the limits of the rule of law, the separation of powers and what ought to be the constitutional limits on any branch of government in a liberal democratic society such as ours."
Addressing what he saw as problems with the new law, Lord Clarke said: "The way this should be resolved is for the Government to say that the facts have changed.
"We are not hearing or testing arguments. I am meant to cast a vote as to whether Rwanda is safe, and I have received an email, the text of the Government’s treaty and the Explanatory Notes."
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Rishi Sunak set to ignore EU judges as he prepares to push through Rwanda planGETTYLord Clarke also questioned the safety of Rwanda, given its history as a dictatorship.
He said: "I do not have the expertise on Rwanda that the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Durham has just demonstrated. I have never been there.
"I know that it has been a one-man dictatorship for more than 20 years, that we sometimes give refugee status here to people fleeing persecution in Rwanda and, indeed, that it has a rather dodgy record—not as bad as some African countries—on human rights in various respects."
Referring to the decision by the Supreme Court that the proposals as they stand represent a breach of international law, he added: "I am not surprised by the judgment."
Lord Clarke was not the only senior figure to criticise the legislation in the House of Lords.
Archbishop of Canterbury Justin Welby, leader of the Church of England said Britain would be undermining its standing in the world if it enacts the plan to send some asylum-seekers on what he called a one-way trip to Rwanda.
He said that “a pick-and-choose approach to international law undermines our global standing...we can, as a nation, do better than this bill."