Labour ministers have saddled British taxpayers with a £3billion bill after seizing control of the Atomic Weapons Establishment pension fund, despite the scheme holding sufficient assets to meet 92 per cent of its obligations independently.
The decision, buried within documents published following the Budget, will transfer responsibility for paying retired nuclear warhead workers from the well-funded scheme to the public purse.
The Atomic Weapons Establishment, which designs and maintains the warheads carried aboard Britain's Trident submarines, returned to Ministry of Defence ownership in 2021 after nearly three decades in private hands.
Its most recent valuation demonstrated it possessed adequate resources to cover the vast majority of its commitments to former employees without Government intervention.
It will become law once the Pensions Schemes Bill receives Royal Assent later this year.
Costs will amount to approximately £284,000 each day over the coming 28 years, totalling around £2.9billion in pension payments to retired staff.
According to calculations by Neil Record, a former Bank of England economist, the scheme's existing assets could cover roughly £2.7billion of these obligations, including projected investment returns approaching £1.5billion.
Ministers intend to liquidate these holdings and direct the proceeds towards general Government expenditure.
Taxpayers face £3billion cost after Labour takes control of nuclear pension fund despite strong assets
|GETTY
This leaves taxpayers entirely responsible for funding the retirement benefits of Atomic Weapons Establishment workers rather than allowing the scheme's investments to generate returns that would substantially offset the cost.
The scheme has already received £67.1million in bailouts since 2021, though its funding position remained strong enough to meet the overwhelming majority of its promises.
Economist Neil Record condemned the Government's approach as part of a "widespread, immoral pattern of behaviour" that prioritises current spending at the expense of future generations.
"The losers are the next generations of taxpayers, and along with the unsustainable national debt and unfunded pensions, these generations will be in real financial trouble."
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Keir Starmer remains Labour's leader | GETTYThe move has drawn comparisons with the 2012 Royal Mail pension transfer, when the Conservative Government absorbed that scheme's £28billion in assets ahead of privatisation.
Ministers spent those funds while leaving taxpayers liable for all retirement payments, a decision that has already cost £16.5billion with a further £28.7billion still outstanding.
That episode ultimately placed a £45billion obligation on the public finances.
Ian Mills, of consultants Barnett Waddingham, characterised the arrangement as a short-term fiscal adjustment.
Mr Mills said: "It's basically just moving money from left pocket to right pocket and makes the numbers look a bit better in the short term."
He added that while taking control of the assets may marginally reduce immediate borrowing requirements, the underlying position remains unchanged because pension obligations must still be met.
A Labour spokesman insisted the decision would not create new liabilities for taxpayers or scheme members and said it would "strengthen the long-term security of members' benefits."
However, they did not address the loss of nearly £1.5billion in potential investment returns that the scheme's assets could have generated over time.