Prince Harry has shocked residents on a leafy London road after knocking on the wrong door while "looking for a friend".
The Duke of Sussex, 40, was searching for his pal along a lengthy stretch of road in Fulham.
In stunning Ring Doorbell footage, the father-of-two was seen in a tieless blue suit while clutching his phone to his right ear.
Harry approached three properties before finding the right one, The Sun has claimed.
The Duke of Sussex watching the sitting volleyball final at Vancouver Convention Centre
PA
One resident said: “We were shocked to see it was him on the camera.
“We only really noticed once neighbours started talking — and then we were like, ‘Oh yes!’”
Another source said: “Two of the houses he knocked at are at completely opposite ends of the road, which is about half a mile long.
“It’s a bit odd he didn’t seem to have a clue which house he was aiming for.
Prince Harry leaves the Royal Courts of Justice
GETTY
"I don’t think many people would just walk down a road knocking on doors, let alone if you don’t feel safe.”
The surprising footage comes after King Charles's youngest son lost his legal battle for taxpayer-funded armed police protection when in the UK, leaving him potentially liable for £1.5million in costs.
Following the verdict, Prince Harry sat down for a TV interview with the BBC where he discussed his ongoing feud with members of the monarchy.
The Duke of Sussex expressed his desire for reconciliation with the Royal Family amid ongoing tensions.
Prince Harry
ReutersWhen asked if he had pleaded with the King to intervene in the security dispute, Harry clarified: "I never asked him to intervene - I asked him to step out of the way and let the experts do their jobs."
Following the verdict, a Buckingham Palace spokesman said: "All of these issues have been examined repeatedly and meticulously by the courts, with the same conclusion reached on each occasion."
In his ruling, Sir Geoffrey Vos acknowledged the Duke's position, stating: "These were powerful and moving arguments and that it was plain the Duke of Sussex felt badly treated by the system."
However, he concluded: "Having studied the detail, I could not say that the Duke's sense of grievance translated into a legal argument to challenge RAVEC's decision."
The Master of the Rolls was definitive in his judgment, adding: "My conclusion was that the Duke of Sussex's appeal would be dismissed."
