Prince Harry set for hefty bill as Duke of Sussex faces paying 'two-thirds' of NGN's legal costs

Prince Harry

Prince Harry is set for a hefty bill as he faces paying two-thirds of News Group Newspapers' legal costs.

Getty
Svar Nanan-Sen

By Svar Nanan-Sen


Published: 05/07/2024

- 11:59

Updated: 05/07/2024

- 13:19

Part of the Duke of Sussex's case against News Group Newspaper will go to trial in January 2025

Prince Harry is set for a hefty bill as he faces paying two-thirds of News Group Newspapers' legal costs.

The Duke of Sussex has been involved in a bitter legal battle with NGN and part of the case will go to trial in January 2025.


Mr Justice Fancourt, the judge presiding over the case, has determined the costs of NGN's application.

Anthony Hudson KC represented NGN in the legal case while David Sherborne represented Prince Harry.

Prince Harry

Prince Harry is set for a hefty bill as he faces paying two-thirds of News Group Newspapers' legal costs.

Getty

In a detailed explanation, Fancourt said: "The first question is whether I can identify who has been the successful party.

"I can, and the successful party to my mind is undoubtedly NGN, although it has not succeeded on the whole of its application.

"The next question for me, then, is whether to make some different order, or adjustment to the order for costs that would otherwise be made that the unsuccessful party pay the successful party's costs.

"Mr Hudson, frankly and straightforwardly, recognises that it can be said that there has been a significant degree to which NGN has not achieved what it set out to achieve."

Prince Harry

The Duke of Sussex has been involved in a bitter legal battle with NGN and part of the case will go to trial in January 2025.

Getty

He added: "I agree with Mr Sherborne to the extent that he says that NGN framed its application too broadly, and I consider that there should be some adjustment to reflect that.

"In addition to the breadth of the relief that was sought and not obtained, there is a question of prematurity."

Justice Fancourt continued: "In my view, NGN was justified in deciding that the time had come where an application should be made.

"There had been previous correspondence which took a great deal of time to progress and not much progress had been made.

Prince Harry

Anthony Hudson KC represented NGN in the legal case while David Sherborne represented Prince Harry.

Getty

"The assessment that the defendant should not wait longer was not an unreasonable one, given that this matter obviously had to be heard before the summer vacation.

"But in any event, regardless of prematurity, if NGN had waited until 3 May for the claimant's solicitors' response, they would still have been in the position of needing to issue the application to obtain the relief that they have succeeded in obtaining today. Therefore, it seems to me that the prematurity point goes nowhere."

The judge concluded: "Looking at the matter in overall terms, therefore, taking account of the extent to which NGN has not succeeded on its application, including both the original wording of the order and the new point introduced, it seems to me that the fair order in the circumstances is that the claimant should pay NGN two-thirds of their costs of the application, to be assessed on the standard basis if not agreed."

You may like