I’m sure we all remember the fuss during the EU referendum campaign over the suggestion emblazoned on the “Vote Leave” battle bus that the £350m Britain sent to Brussels every week would be better spent on the NHS.
How the shrill voices of the Remain campaign went into meltdown over that one. The lies! The deception! The sheer audacity of those “post-truth” Brexiteers seeking to mislead the masses with their false promises!
In the judgement of the chattering classes, that bus had a significant influence on the result. But their judgement was seriously skewed.
I was a foot soldier of the Leave campaign and can recall thinking at the time that if these people genuinely believe millions are going to vote for Brexit because of something they read on the side of a bus, they really do not understand their own country and have no sense of the anger that has been building inside it over the past couple of decades.
They still haven’t got over it. Even today, the metropolitan elitists see the Brexit vote and the wicked “lies” of the Leave campaign as the catalyst for Britain’s turn from being a nation of tolerance and enlightenment to one infected with rampant bigotry and hate.
And that mindset shapes their entire political outlook – in particular, their obsession with seeking ever-tighter restrictions, whether through the law or social sanction, on what people may say and when they may say it.
They truly believe that large swathes of voters – especially those from the working classes – are unwitting dupes, people without agency or sufficient intelligence to arrive at their own opinions. These voters are, in their eyes, fodder for the populist Right, prey to its falsehoods and “disinformation”.
After the referendum campaign, some aggrieved liberal voices made calls for leaders of the Leave campaign to be prosecuted. Others questioned the legitimacy of the democratic process itself, grumbling that if the masses misused the vote in this way, then perhaps it would be wiser not to let them have it at all. Then Donald Trump went and got elected across the pond, and they really flipped.
A full decade later, they are still fixated on controlling the public narrative. That’s why they take against any person, outlet or platform that dares to challenge their own narrow worldview.
They hate GB News and refuse to appear on it. They loathe Elon Musk’s “X” and – for reasons I suspect are more a pretext than genuine – have its Grok AI tool in their crosshairs. Too many people are being hauled through the courts for saying or writing things which ought never to be regarded as crimes. And the Online Safety Act has, as some of us always feared it would, become something of an Orwellian censorship tool.
Prosecuting politicians for lying is authoritarianism cloaked as virtue. This will end badly - Paul Embery
| WELSH SENEDDThe latest authoritarian move comes in the form of a proposal by the Labour government in Wales to make it a criminal offence for a politician to “lie” during an election campaign.
Now, don’t get me wrong, I do not want to see politicians making false or misleading statements in the hope of being elected. But how on Earth is such a measure remotely practical? How might it be policed? Who would determine what, in the cut and thrust of a febrile political campaign, constituted a “lie”?
Depressingly, it seems that the idea has caught on, for the Westminster parliament is also set to discuss a similar proposal tabled by Labour MP Luke Myer. Mr Myer wants to make it a crime for senior politicians, such as the Prime Minister and Cabinet members, to deliberately mislead the public.
It seems to me that these proposals have been dreamed up for a single reason – to put the frighteners on any “populist” campaigner with designs on standing for office.
Were they to become law, the proposals would have the most chilling effect on legitimate debate, with the likelihood that nonconformist election candidates would constantly be walking on eggshells, scared to say anything radical or unorthodox in case it lands them in a prison cell.
Throughout history, politicians have embellished, exaggerated and “spun”. It may not be right, but in a free and democratic society, it’s almost inevitable.
By all means, kick them out of office if they fail to honour their pledges. But if we’re going to start prosecuting election candidates every time they overstep the mark on the hustings, we will be driving a coach and horses through political democracy in this country.
The proposals being discussed in Cardiff and Westminster are unworkable and should be ditched. The liberal authoritarians supporting them really need to get used to the fact that Britain is changing, and they are no longer always destined to get their way as they did in the past. Their time would be better spent understanding why that change is happening rather than constantly seeking to silence those attempting to bring it about.
More From GB News