Only Islamist Britain could have kicked America in the shins on the eve of the Iran war - Lee Cohen

Only Islamist Britain could have kicked America in the shins on the eve of the Iran war - Lee Cohen
British Iranian who completed 72-day hunger strike rages at Labour’s ‘failure to proscribe Iran’s IRGC’ |

GB

Lee Cohen

By Lee Cohen


Published: 01/03/2026

- 15:16

Keir Starmer has cemented his legacy as an Islamist appeaser, writes the US columnist

Donald Trump has launched Operation Epic Fury against the Iranian regime, killing Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, one of the most treacherous enemies of the West.

On 28 February 2026, the United States, in joint action with Israel, struck military installations, nuclear facilities, ballistic missile sites, naval assets, and leadership targets across Iran.


Trump declared major combat operations underway to destroy Iran's missile industry, annihilate its navy, eliminate its nuclear threat, and give the Iranian people their chance to overthrow the mullahs.

He urged Iranians to rise up and take control of their government. This decisive strike against the hub of state-sponsored terror will define Trump's legacy with a blaze of glory: confronting the most implacable evil head-on when others falter.

Keir Starmer's legacy will be the opposite: crushing Britain's sovereignty, security, and prosperity through retreat, concession, and cowardice; degrading its respect on the world stage.

Where Trump acts to protect the West from a regime that arms proxies, pursues nuclear weapons, and represses its citizens, Starmer blunders, equivocates and surrenders.

In his statement yesterday, the Prime Minister condemned Iran's retaliatory strikes but refused to endorse the US-Israeli action.

He emphasised de-escalation, urged restraint, and confirmed British forces are engaged only in defensive operations — planes in the sky to shield allies, never striking the aggressor.

Starmer's words reveal hesitation: Iran must “refrain from further strikes” and “give up their weapons programmes,” while he avoids backing the regime's destruction. This is not leadership; it is moral equivocation born of fear.The pattern is clear and damning.

Labour's governance erodes Britain piece by piece. Weeks before the strikes, the government refused to allow offensive use of RAF Fairford and Diego Garcia, citing concerns that such action would breach international law and make Britain complicit. While Trump struck decisively to cripple the regime, Starmer confined British forces to defensive patrols only.

The Chagos Islands betrayal persists: Starmer clings to his plan to cede sovereignty to Mauritius, even as Trump — explicitly linking the base's future to Iran contingencies — calls it a “big mistake” and urges against handing away Diego Garcia. This risks strategic leverage in the Indian Ocean amid rising global threats, all to appease legalistic internationalism.
Gibraltar fares no better.

Lee Cohen (left), Keir Starmer  (right)Only Islamist Britain could have kicked America in the shins on the eve of the Iran war - Lee Cohen |

Getty Images

Starmer's reluctance to stand with Trump and Israel stems from the same timidity that prevents proscribing the IRGC — Tehran's terror arm — despite its role in repression and proxy violence.

Small boats pour across the Channel unchecked. Influence from radical ideologies grows in towns and cities across Britain, where integration has faltered and social cohesion frays. A government that fears alienating certain communities at home cannot summon resolve against threats abroad.

Geopolitically, Britain faces stark realities. The Special Relationship provides deterrence, intelligence, and power projection — no European substitute exists for hard security.

Energy independence demands freedom from hostile suppliers; secure borders require unflinching control over migration that strains resources and culture.

Defence must match rhetoric with action, not hollow commitments. Trump's strikes demonstrate that focused resolve and credible force restore leverage and deter aggression.

Britain's current course— blocking US offensive use of its own bases, ceding territories, equivocating on Iran, tilting toward the EU — diminishes that leverage and accelerates decline.

The choice is binary and inescapable. Britain can reclaim its place by aligning with Trump's resolve: standing shoulder to shoulder with brave nations against Iranian terror, rejecting retreat, and prioritising sovereignty, security, and the transatlantic bond that has sustained freedom.

Or it can follow Starmer deeper into impotence and irrelevance — surrendering outposts, appeasing threats, crawling back to the EU and watching national pride erode under a government more concerned with not offending than with defending.

History will record Trump's legacy as the man who brought down the most fearsome enemies of the West. Starmer will be the leader who lets Britain decay and destruct. The British people deserve far better. But can they wait until 2029?

More From GB News