Laurence Fox loses libel battle in High Court over social media row

Laurence Fox loses libel battle in High Court over social media row

Nigel Farage addressed Laurence Fox's exit

ITV/Good Morning Britain
Dimitris Kouimtsidis

By Dimitris Kouimtsidis


Published: 29/01/2024

- 19:58

The actor-turned-politician was sued by former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal over a row on social media in October 2020

Laurence Fox has lost a High Court libel case against two people following a social media row four years ago.

The 45-year-old was sued by former Stonewall trustee Simon Blake and drag artist Crystal - real name Colin Seymour - over a row on Twitter (now X), in October 2020.


Fox called Blake and Seymour “paedophiles” in an exchange about a decision by Sainsbury’s to mark Black History Month.

The actor-turned-politician – who said at the time that he would boycott the supermarket – counter-sued the pair and broadcaster Nicola Thorp over tweets accusing him of racism.

Laurence Fox outside the Royal Courts of Justice

Laurence Fox lost the libel case

PA

In a judgment on Monday, Justice Collins Rice ruled in favour of Blake and Seymour, dismissing Fox’s counter-claims.

She said: “Mr Fox’s labelling of Mr Blake and Mr Seymour as paedophiles was, on the evidence, probabilities and facts of this case, seriously harmful, defamatory and baseless.

“The law affords few defences to defamation of this sort.

“Mr Fox did not attempt to show these allegations were true, and he was not able to bring himself on the facts within the terms of any other defence recognised in law.”

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Laurence Fox outside the Royal Courts of Justice

Fox called Blake and Seymour “paedophiles”

PA

However, Justice Collins Rice did not make a ruling on whether describing Fox as “a racist” is “substantially true”, after finding the three tweets in his counter-claim were unlikely to cause serious harm to his reputation.

She said: “Mr Fox’s principal project is to put his views and challenges about racism to the UK electorate in the political arena.

“That, rather than a court of law, is in any event likely to be the determinative last word in relation to his reputation on such matters, given the path down which he has set.

“His world view and his politics are not on trial in these proceedings, only the factual impact of what he said, and what was said about him, on this particular occasion.”

The former GB News presenter added that he plans to appeal against the ruling to get a meaning of the word racist.

He said: “What is a racist? Every single person in this country knows what a racist is, except the people that dominate every single national institution that we have.

“Racism as a term is used just as a point of disagreement, and a point of ‘I don’t like you, therefore you’re a racist’.

“This is a great, wonderful country and I admire and I respect this country, and I fight for it and I fight for my children and I fight for everybody else out there who doesn’t have my platform who gets called these vicious slurs, and I just want a definition of the word.”

Laurence Fox outside the Royal Courts of Justice

Laurence Fox stated he plans to appeal the ruling

PA

During a trial in London in November, the Reclaim Party founder said he faced a “significant decline” in the number and quality of roles he was offered after he was accused of being a racist.

But in the 41-page ruling, Justice Collins Rice said it would be “extremely long odds” for the trio’s tweets to have caused the current state of his acting career, or other serious harm.

She continued: “It is not only what he says, but how he says it, that regularly ignites controversy around Mr Fox, deliberately or otherwise.”

“There are indeed choices to be made about the exercise of free speech, and there are consequences,” the judge added.

You may like