Football pundit slams 'petty' and 'pathetic' FA after being hit with ground ban

Jack Otway
Tue, 21 Apr 2026 08:20:52 +0000

Former Hearts and Hibs midfielder Michael Stewart has launched a scathing attack on the Scottish Football Association, labelling their decision to bar him from Hampden Park as "petty" and "pathetic."

The 45-year-old pundit was prevented from entering Scotland's national stadium for both Scottish Cup semi-final matches over the weekend, a move he claims establishes a "dangerous precedent" for the sport.

Stewart, who was scheduled to appear as part of Premier Sports' broadcasting coverage for the double-header at Mount Florida, has accused senior figures at Hampden of creating a "false narrative" surrounding the circumstances of his exclusion.

The ban came in direct response to Stewart's vocal criticism of officiating standards in Scottish football, sparking a fierce row between the broadcaster and football authorities.

TRENDING

Stories

Videos

Your Say

The situation descended into farce on Saturday when Stewart managed to contribute to coverage of the Dunfermline versus Falkirk clash by broadcasting live from a production vehicle stationed outside the ground.

However, Hampden officials subsequently extended the prohibition to include the car park itself, forcing Premier Sports to remove Stewart from their punditry lineup for the second semi-final on Sunday.

The broadcaster has publicly backed their analyst, issuing a statement prior to Sunday's match that criticised the SFA and accused them of censorship.

Meanwhile, the Senior Scottish Football Referees' Association threw its support behind the governing body's stance, with officials reportedly lodging complaints describing Stewart's commentary on refereeing matters as "disproportionate, agenda-driven and personal."

Stewart traced the origins of the dispute to an incident at the SMiSA Stadium, where he accused officials of attempting to "cover up" their mistakes regarding an offside decision during a St Mirren versus Hibs match.

He later apologised for his choice of words but maintains his underlying criticism was valid.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Alan Shearer fears Premier League manager will lose job after worrying signs

Pep Guardiola faces major dilemma over Man City future after Arsenal victory

Stan Moody ‘gutted’ after nightmare collapse on World Snooker Championship debut

"I was not trying to suggest there is a grand conspiracy here, but a mistake by the officials, and that mistake wasn't articulated to us," Stewart explained on Premier Sports' Scottish Football Social Club podcast.

The pundit acknowledged he could have expressed himself more carefully but insisted officials were attempting to minimise their error.

He rejected claims of prolonged complaints against him, questioning why the SFA failed to raise concerns directly with their broadcasting partners at Premier Sports if issues had persisted for over a year.

Stewart expressed alarm at the broader implications of the SFA's actions, questioning what kind of country permits an institution to ban someone simply for holding a contrary opinion.

"There's a serious issue here and a dangerous precedent set by the SFA. They see fit to ban me for things that I've said," he stated.

The former midfielder insisted he takes pride in delivering honest assessments, even when this displeases those in authority.

"Ultimately, I'm not here to appease them. I'm trying to be honest, and I think that's important," he added.

Stewart called for proper dialogue to resolve the impasse, noting that Premier Sports had been seeking improved communication with the governing body since October.

"That's not how grown-ups behave," he concluded.