Instead of slamming the PM's allowance, we should be asking why council bosses are paid more - Stuart Fawcett

Stuart Fawcett
Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:56:38 +0000
Membership

The office of the Prime Minister should be regarded as the ultimate aspiration of public service. To that end, it must be supported by a remuneration package that reflects the gravity of the role, enabling the holder to represent Britain’s highest public office with the dignity it deserves.

Based on his conduct and adherence to protocol, it is clear that the Prime Minister treats the office with exactly that respect.

It is a logistical and security necessity that the Prime Minister and senior Ministers are housed in Government accommodation. Given the historic nature of these buildings, periodic refurbishment is unavoidable.

It is important to note that the Prime Minister has strictly adhered to the established £30,000 annual allowance for such works, regardless of the level of personal aesthetic direction involved in the maintenance of the Downing Street flat.

Recent reports have highlighted a significant disparity in public sector pay, with hundreds of local council employees and senior civil servants now earning more than the Prime Minister — often significantly outstripping the salaries of the very Ministers and Council Leaders to whom they report.

First Lord of the Treasury, the Prime Minister oversees a national budget exceeding £1.3trillion.

We must realistically weigh the immense level of responsibility for public funds against a remuneration package that has arguably failed to keep pace with the demands and scale of the office.