British Airways sued by businessman for £50k after 'suffering flashbacks and nightmares' from cutting his little finger

Fintan Starkey
Tue, 14 Apr 2026 11:17:26 +0000

A 61-year-old Essex businessman is pursuing legal action against British Airways, seeking damages exceeding £50,000 after sustaining finger lacerations from a concealed sharp object in his aircraft seat.

Andrew Chesterton, formerly the chief operating officer at financial services firm Bravura Solutions, was travelling from Heathrow to Cincinnati for a holiday when the incident occurred in September 2023.

The Chelmsford resident claims the accident left him with permanent physical impairments and psychological trauma, including recurring nightmares and flashbacks.

Whilst the airline has accepted responsibility for the accident, it is contesting the compensation amount Mr Chesterton is seeking, particularly challenging his entitlement to damages for alleged psychiatric harm.

TRENDING

Stories

Videos

Your Say

The dispute centres on whether his claimed mental health difficulties qualify for compensation under international aviation law.

Court documents filed by Mr Chesterton's barrister Jessica Muurman detail how the injury unfolded in September 2023.

"On September 24 2023, during the course of the flight, the claimant reached between his seat, Seat 1A, using his left hand," she states in the particulars of claim.

"A sharp object, unbeknown to the claimant, was present in the fold of his seat and caused a laceration to his left ring finger and left little finger."

The businessman experienced immediate pain and shock, with cabin crew members stepping in to help control the bleeding during the remainder of the flight.

Upon landing in Cincinnati, emergency services transported him to hospital where medical staff cleaned the wounds and applied a total of 11 stitches, four to his ring finger and seven to his little finger.

The aftermath of the accident proved extensive, with Mr Chesterton's ring finger remaining uncomfortable and hypersensitive for five months following the injury.

His little finger wound subsequently developed an infection, necessitating antibiotic treatment.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

British holidaymakers left fuming after missing flight back to Britain from Spain over new EU travel rules: 'Are we getting punished for Brexit?'

Immigration lawyers REFUSE to represent migrants due for deportation to France

US rejects Iran's proposal to halt nuclear development for five years as JD Vance labels it 'red line'

The incident has left him with permanent scarring - a 15mm mark on his ring finger and an 18mm scar on his little finger.

According to court papers, he continues to experience ongoing hypersensitivity, stiffness and diminished grip strength in his left little finger, with these effects described as permanent.

Mr Chesterton was prevented from driving for roughly two months post-accident, affecting both his daily routine and social activities.

He has since undergone five physiotherapy sessions to address his continuing physical symptoms and must now adapt everyday tasks, including reducing lifting activities in his garden.

Beyond the physical injuries, Mr Chesterton claims significant psychological consequences stemming from the accident.

For approximately three months afterwards, he developed anxiety about social situations, steering clear of events such as sporting fixtures and concerts due to fears of his injured fingers being knocked.

The businessman also reports experiencing flashbacks to the incident and was prescribed sleeping tablets in late October 2023 after suffering nightmares and sleep difficulties.

However, British Airways is disputing his entitlement to compensation for these psychological effects.

British Airways barrister Christopher Loxton argues in the airline's defence that "article 17(1) of the Montreal Convention allows a passenger to recover damages for 'bodily injury' or death," thereby excluding psychiatric harm from recoverable damages.

The case will proceed to a full damages assessment unless both parties reach an out-of-court settlement.